Obama’s Speech To Students – The “I”s Have It

Via Hot Air

He just can’t help himself.

  • 56 iterations of “I”
  • 19 iterations of “school”
  • 10 iterations of “education”
  • 8 iterations of “responsibility”
  • 7 iterations of “country”
  • 5 iterations each of “parents”, “teachers”
  • 3 iterations of “nation”

JammieWearingFool rightly notes that AIDS and homelessness may not be age-appropriate topics for little kids:

You’ll need the knowledge and problem-solving skills you learn in science and math to cure diseases like cancer and AIDS, and to develop new energy technologies and protect our environment. You’ll need the insights and critical thinking skills you gain in history and social studies to fight poverty and homelessness, crime and discrimination, and make our nation more fair and more free. You’ll need the creativity and ingenuity you develop in all your classes to build new companies that will create new jobs and boost our economy

Of course the personal story makes its way into the speech:

I get it. I know what that’s like. My father left my family when I was two years old, and I was raised by a single mother who struggled at times to pay the bills anr in my life. There were times when I was lonely and felt lid wasn’t always able to give us things the other kids had. There were times when I missed having a fatheke [sic] I didn’t fit in.

And this:

But I was fortunate. I got a lot of second chances and had the opportunity to go to college, and law school, and follow my dreams. My wife, our First Lady Michelle Obama, has a similar story. Neither of her parents had gone to college, and they didn’t have much. But they worked hard, and she worked hard, so that she could go to the best schools in this country.

He forgot to mention that Michelle turned around and wrote a disparaging thesis about one of those “best schools” she attended.

MA Legislators To Debate Changing Successor Law On Wednesday, GOP Urging Activists To Attend

I can’t wait to watch these hypocrite hacks try to explain what has changed so much between 2004 and 2009….besides the party affiliation of the governor.

Before his death last month from brain cancer, Kennedy sent a letter to Patrick, Senate President Therese Murray, and House Speaker Robert DeLeo to ask lawmakers to change state law to allow an interim Senate appointee to serve until a special election can be held. Patrick, who has scheduled the Senate election for Jan. 19, supports the change, saying Massachusetts needs two voices in the Senate during the next five months.

Key Democrats in the US Senate – including Majority Leader Harry Reid and John F. Kerry – also support the interim appointment as they prepare for debate on President Obama’s health care overhaul.

But Republicans point out that just five years ago, the Democrat-controlled Massachusetts House and Senate changed the state law to block the governor, Mitt Romney, from naming a fellow Republican to fill the seat if Kerry, the Democrats’ presidential nominee, had won his White House campaign.

Previously, the governor was allowed to appoint a nominee until the next general election.

As part of the 2004 change, Democratic lawmakers also blocked the possibility of Romney naming an interim senator.

DeLeo and Murray have not said whether they support changing the law.

Could the hearing turn into a  “town hall” style protest?

Tarah Donoghue, communications director for the Massachusetts Republican Party, said the GOP is urging activists to attend the hearing. The party is also circulating an online petition gathering names of those opposed to the bill via social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook.

Donoghue said opposition to the change extends beyond Massachusetts, noting that “Republicans nationwide are outraged about what’s happening’’ in the state.

“We are certainly organizing our concerned activist community so they can be heard at next week’s hearing,’’ she said. “Democrats want to change the law in their favor for the second time in five years.’’

I think this will come down a to a very close vote, but I still can’t get a clear read on which way the hacks will go with this.  They know the national mood has soured on Obama and ObamaCare.  Changing the law will be seen as nothing but a partisan maneuver to ensure a filibuster-proof Senate and could ignite a backlash –  even here in uber liberal Massachusetts.