Nutty Professor Charged In Brother’s 1986 Shooting Death

Twenty-four years and three additional dead bodies later, Amy Bishop has been indicted in the 1986 shooting death of her brother, Seth.

(photo credit boston.com)

CANTON – A biology professor charged with killing three of her colleagues at an Alabama university has been indicted in the 1986 shooting death of her brother in Massachusetts.

Norfolk District Attorney William Keating announced Wednesday that Amy Bishop had been charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 18-year-old brother, Seth.

Authorities had originally ruled her brother’s shooting an accident. But they reopened the case after Bishop was charged in February with gunning down six of her colleagues at the University of Alabama-Huntsville, killing three.

Imagine how the families of Bishop’s latest victims feel knowing that in 1986 there was sufficient evidence to indict her and almsot certainly would have prevented the murders of their loved ones.

Left-Wing Nutty Professor Updates: Braintee Police Reports Found, D.A. Says She Should Have Been Charged, Bishop Went Moe Green At IHOP

The Braintree mayor says the missing police reports were found with a retired Braintree cop.

Braintree Mayor Joseph Sullivan said the missing files were found with an unnamed, retired Braintree police captain.

Read the reports here

The name of this police captain must be released and any possible connections to the Bishop family need to be investigated.

Current Norfolk County D.A., William Keating, says police should have at minimum charged Bishop with assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm.

Keating said last night the reports indicate Bishop, then 20, at a minimum could have been prosecuted for assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm after she told cops she shot a hole in the chest of her only sibling, Seth Bishop, 18, with the family’s shotgun on Dec. 6, 1986.

But Keating said the statute of limitations has expired on those charges, as well as manslaughter based on reckless conduct.

In 2000, Bishop was charged with assault and battery after she pulled a Moe Green at the IHOP in Peabody.

Bishop was charged with assault and battery for a March 2002 incident, in which an enraged Bishop unleashed a profanity-laced tirade against a mother whose child got the last booster seat at the Peabody International House of Pancakes, according to a Peabody police report.

She yelled “I am Amy Bishop” and then punched the frightened mother in her head. When police questioned Bishop, she claimed to be the victim, the report stated.

Prosecutors asked that Bishop, who received probation, take anger management classes. It is unclear if she did.

If the classes were a condition of her probation she would have been required to take the classes and to provide documentation to her probation officer or be found in violation.

She was a menace in her former Newton, MA and Huntsville, AL neighborhoods as well.

During the mid-1990s, when the couple lived in Newton, they called the cops twice – once to report a “suspicious vehicle idling in front of the home,” and again when Anderson complained about an unruly MBTA bus driver who he claimed nearly ran him down.

In Huntsville, neighbor Sherry Foley, 63, recalled that Bishop wrangled with another neighbor over a barking dog.

“Amy Bishop got all bent out of shape because she said his dogs were barking and disturbing her,” Foley said. “She would call him every hour on the hour. They weren’t even his dogs.”

This self-absorbed, paranoid, abusive, dangerous woman has been terrorizing innocent people since at least 1986.  How she was able to procure a job in an academic environment after the 2002 incident is going to be yet another question of which the families of Bishop’s victims deserve an answer.

Bill Delahunt, Braintree P.D. Have Some ‘Splainin To Do

Scroll for updates

Amy Bishop, the nutty professor who went on a killing spree at the University of Alabama at Huntsville on Friday, has killed before.  And not just anyone.  In 1986 she fatally shot her brother after an argument.  What happened next has all the makings of a coverup.

“I don’t want to use the word ‘coverup.’ I don’t know what the thought process was at the time,” said Braintree Police Chief Paul Frazier yesterday at an explosive press conference, adding later, “It reflects poorly on the department. This would not happen in this day and age.”

On Dec. 6, 1986, Frazier said, then-20-year-old Amy Bishop blasted her brother, Seth Bishop, 18 – described in newspaper reports at the time as a talented violinist and science student – with a shotgun during an argument, fled the family’s Victorian manse and was later arrested by cops at gunpoint.

So she was then taken into custody, booked, charged and arraigned right?  Wrong.

According to Frazier, then-Chief John Polio ordered cops to release Bishop – whose mother, Judith Bishop, Frazier said was a public official sitting on the Personnel Committee.

“I spoke with the retired deputy chief who was . . . responsible for booking Ms. Bishop. He said he had started the process when he received a call from then-Police Chief John Polio or possibly from a captain on Chief Polio’s behalf,” Frazier said.

“He was instructed to stop the booking process. At some point Ms. Bishop was turned over to her mother and they left the building via a rear exit. . . . The release of Ms. Bishop did not sit well with the police officers.”

The former police chief is claiming that there was nothing unusual about releasing Bishop before any charges were filed and says he turned the case over to the D.A.  now U.S. Congressman, Bill Delahunt.  

But Mr. Polio, 87, reached at home on Saturday, called even the suggestion of a cover-up laughable and said that the case had been handled lawfully. He said he remembered there being a shooting and recalled that Dr. Bishop and her brother had been “horsing around.”

“Everything was done that should have been done under the circumstances,” Mr. Polio said in a phone interview. “She was questioned, and then turned over to her mother. The determination was made that we were going to turn the inquiry over to the district attorney.”

Delahunt has developed amnesia.

Delahunt, now a congressman, yesterday said in a telephone interview that he did not recall the case.

I’m not ready to say this definitely was a cover-up, but there are many questions that need to be answered.  The Braintree PD needs to determine, who it was that called in the orders to release Bishop.  Delahunt needs to be more forthcoming and work with the current DA to determine what role (if any) that his office played.  And yes, any connections between the Bishop family and any members of the Braintree PD or Delahunt’s office in 1986 need to be sought.  If nothing else, the handling of this case was severely bungled and there are now three families in Alabama who may not be planning funerals for their loved ones had Bishop been prosecuted.

Update #1 – 2/14/10 @ 11:33 a.m.:

The Boston Channel reports that it was Delahunt who made the call to Polio resulting Bishop’s release.

Braintree officers who remember the 1986 shooting said that former police Chief John Polio dismissed detectives from the case and ordered the department to release Amy Bishop after a telephone conversation with former district attorney William Delahunt, who is currently a U.S. congressman from Massachusetts.

“The police officers here were very upset about that,” said Frazier, who was a patrolman at the time and spoke to officers who remembered the incident that day, including one who filed a report on it.

 When contacted Saturday, Polio, now 86, said that there was no cover up in Seth Bishop’s death, though there were questions about whether the shooting was an accident.

 “I remember Judy Bishop and that she had two children and I know that they got into an argument one day and somehow a shot got involved, or a weapon of some kind, and it went off, according to them by accident. According to the mother and to the daughter, by the daughter,” Polio said in a telephone interview with The Patriot Ledger.

 Polio told NewsCenter 5 he has no memory of telling officers to go home. He said there was an inquest by Delahunt’s office and that the district attorney found that the shooting did not warrant charges. Polio said he doesn’t know how the records would have gone missing.

Amy Bishop and her husband, James Anderson, were questioned after a package containing two bombs was sent to the Newton home of Dr. Paul Rosenberg, a professor and doctor at Boston’s Children’s Hospital.[…]

Bishop surfaced as a suspect because she was allegedly concerned that she was going to receive a negative evaluation from Rosenberg on her doctorate work, the official said. The official said investigators believed she had a motive to target Rosenberg and were concerned that she had a history of violence, given that she had shot her brother to death in 1986.

Investigators conducted a search of the home where Bishop and Anderson were living and questioned the couple, the official said. Anderson was questioned about whether he had purchased any of the components used to make the bombs, the official said.

During a search of Bishop’s computer, authorities found a draft of a novel that Bisthop was writing about a female scientist who had killed her brother and was hoping to make amends by hoping to become a great scientist, according to a person who was briefed on the investigation and spoke to the Globe on the condition of anonymity.

The US attorney’s office in Boston did not seek any charges against Bishop or Anderson, and no one was ever charged with mailing the bombs to Rosenberg.

“The police officers here were very upset about that,” said Frazier, who was a patrolman at the time and spoke to officers  who remembered the incident that day, including one who filed a report on it.

Did Delahunt broom the case?

Update #2 – 2/14/10 @ 6:40 p.m. via Ace of Spades

Amy Bishop Was a Suspect in 1993 Unsolved Bombing Attempt

Amy Bishop and her husband, James Anderson, were questioned after a package containing two bombs was sent to the Newton home of Dr. Paul Rosenberg, a professor and doctor at Boston’s Children’s Hospital.

[…]

Bishop surfaced as a suspect because she was allegedly concerned that she was going to receive a negative evaluation from Rosenberg on her doctorate work, the official said. The official said investigators believed she had a motive to target Rosenberg and were concerned that she had a history of violence, given that she had shot her brother to death in 1986.

Investigators conducted a search of the home where Bishop and Anderson were living and questioned the couple, the official said. Anderson was questioned about whether he had purchased any of the components used to make the bombs, the official said.

During a search of Bishop’s computer, authorities found a draft of a novel that Bisthop was writing about a female scientist who had killed her brother and was hoping to make amends by hoping to become a great scientist, according to a person who was briefed on the investigation and spoke to the Globe on the condition of anonymity.

The US attorney’s office in Boston did not seek any charges against Bishop or Anderson, and no one was ever charged with mailing the bombs to Rosenberg.

(emphasis mine)

This was seven years after she killed her brother without being charged with so much as involuntary manslaughter by then D.A., Bill Delahunt.