About That Coverage For Children With Pre-Existing Conditions…

It doesn’t kick in until 2014. 

The Obama administration is scrambling to fix a potential problem with a much-touted benefit of its new health care law, a gap in coverage improvements for children in poor health, officials said Tuesday.

Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill President Barack Obama signed into law Tuesday.

However, if a child is accepted for coverage, or is already covered, the insurer cannot exclude payment for treating a particular illness, as sometimes happens now. For example, if a child has asthma, the insurance company cannot write a policy that excludes that condition from coverage. The new safeguard will be in place later this year.

In recent speeches, Obama has given the impression that the immediate benefit for kids is much more robust.

Full protection for children would not come until 2014, said Kate Cyrul, a spokeswoman for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, another panel that authored the legislation. That’s the same year when insurance companies could no longer deny coverage to any person on account of health problems.

Obama’s public statements conveyed the impression that the new protections for kids were sweeping and straightforward.

That’s a nice way of saying he lied.  In other words, his lips were moving.

3 thoughts on “About That Coverage For Children With Pre-Existing Conditions…

  1. What a convoluted nightmare. Who in their right mind would be proud of such a deceit? Oh, ok we’re dealing with the deemonrats.

    I especially like the fact 26 year old “children” will now be able to get abortions on demand while my rates skyrocket.I feel so privileged./

  2. For the Left, “truth” is an objective thing. There is that which advances your cause, and that which does not. The “truth” is irrelevant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s